tired of sleeping on the floor 这是一个分词短语什么是分词短语 前边省略了being

相关推荐

• 为什么是generally speaking而非general ,speaking究竟是动名词还是现在分词?副词可以修饰分词吗?1.generally speaking= it is generally speaking副词 generally 在 is 在后,it is 省略2.这是一个固定的短语,用于引导后面的内容,speak不是句子的主体结构谓语,实际是分词短语,所以用分词形式.两种解释究竟哪个才对?求详解,最好能类举相似的例句谢谢!
• tired of sleeping on the floor 这是一个分词短语什么是分词短语 前边省略了being
• 请分析一下下面这个句子原句：Because she was disappointed with the results of the experiments,she started a new one.过去分词做状语：Disappointed with the results of the experiments,she started a new one.（可否用现在分词做状语,改成：Being disappointed with the results of the experiments,she started a new one.）如果可以,现在分词做状语的句子与过去分词做状语的句子有什么区别?原句：Tied of sleeping on the floor,A young man saved up for years to buy a real bed.书上给出的分析是说这句话是省略了现在分词Being。那为什么不直接理解成过去分词做状语？
• 英语中关于分词作状语的问题我们知道分词可以作状语,例如：The students went out of the classroom ,laughing and talking.这时句中的laugh 和 talking 单独作状语,中间用连词连接.但下面这句话：Accompanied by his friends ,he went to the hospital.这句话中的 “Accompanied by his friends ”作状语,但已经不是单独是一个过去分词作状语了.我的问题就是：上述的第二种情况作状语的是不是一个分词短语?这种作状语的语法结构是什么?是省略句吗?还是有其他的规则?
• 英语的修饰词位置有什么习惯么?Talking about novels and stories primarily as instruments of ideology circumvent much of fictional enterprise.里面的instruments of ideology能不能换做 ideological instruments?换了有什么意义差别?为什么有的时候就可以是：名词+of+名词比如:the realm of literature 大多时候就是 形容词+名词这样修饰?successfully alters the approach (which is)taken by most previous studies.中taken by...是过去分词短语做状语修饰宾语approach还是一个省略了which的宾语从句呢?有时候我会分不开!1.例如：Talking about novels and stories primarily as ideological
• tired of sleeping on the floor 这是一个分词短语什么是分词短语 前边省略了being
• tired of sleeping on the floor,a young man in teheran saved up for years to buy a real bed时态tired of sleeping on the floor,a young man in teheran saved up for years to buy a real bed为什么buy 要用原型而不用过去式
• My mother went abroad for{ }(far) study last year.用far的正确形式填空