请解析一下这个英语句子要详细.
问题描述：
请解析一下这个英语句子要详细.
China rejected accusations by critics that it was responsible for the results at Copenhagen.尤其是这个从句.
答
by critics是插入语,介词短语做后置定语修饰accusations.同样这个从句也是修饰名词accusations的,那么它就可能是定语从句或是同位语从句.那怎么分辨呢?首先,在定语从句中that是必须做句子成分的,而that后面 it was responsible for the results at Copenhagen很明显是一个完整的句子,并不缺少成分,所以that在句中不做成分,不会是定从,只能是同位语从句.