You are simply being polite.句子结构是怎么样的?请帮我分析一下!

相关推荐

• 和判断非谓语和独立主格有关吧the first textbooks( )for teaching English as a foreign language came out in the 16th century选项 A having written B to be written C being written D written填written 我想问 written不是非谓语吧?as后面的句子是时间状语从句吗,请帮忙分析一下句子的结构with a lot of difficult problems ( ) ,the manager felt worried all the time A settled B to be settled C settling D to settle 我选D
• 合并句子题!can you tell me whose backpack is that?can you tell me?whose backpack is black?怎么分析出来的第一句是对表语提问,第二句是对主语的定语进行的提问?因为分析不好所以不会合并第一句.我知道宾语从句的从句得用陈述语序所以第二句从句的陈述语序是不变的,而我觉得第一句的陈述语序是that backpack is 所以做的不对?请大家从语法上帮我分析一下,正确的第一句是backpack that is
• 请帮我分析一下这句话的句子结构,主谓宾等moon is kept tied to the earth by the earth's gravitational pull.这句话是不是被动语态?如果是为什么会有两个动词,kept和tied我都晕了
• You speak English quite well.其中quite well是speak的状语,还是English的补语?这个句子中的quite well,我越想就越觉的分不清是什么成分,请高手帮我分析一下是什么成分,以及为什么是状语或为什么是宾语补语?刚才看了些东西，意思应该是凡是宾补，宾语和补语之间都有逻辑主谓关系，把其翻译一下若和原句意思一致就是补语了。所以一读，确实应该像“非常”说的那样应该是状语，否则就意思变了。但不是因为副词就非做状语的关系，副词是可以做补语的。如：I saw the kite up and down.heyexiff 您说不是状语，是补语，但不是宾补？我知道补语只有主补和宾补，明显不是主补，就应该是宾补？还有其它？不知！如果是状语，你这么一说我还真分不清是修饰句子还是修饰谓语动词了。
• 下面这个句子的结构是怎么样的,有谁能帮我分析一下.第一个this,和逗号后的that,以及后面的as that
• let me protect you,in the vicissitudes of life years上面的英文句子语法结构及词语运用正确吗?如不对,请纠正,这句话的中文本意是:让我来保护你,在沧沧的岁月里.或者直接帮我翻译一下,
• 请英语高手们帮我分析一下这个句子的结构好吗(这一段英文是一个句子,句子太长我分析不来T_T),
• that's for children of up to three years old.这句话的句子结构是怎样的,请大神帮我分析一下这个句子
• 高手分析一下这个句子的结构请帮我分下一下这个句子的结构,哪个是主语哪个是表语等等~.No one really knows how the ancient egyptians build the pyramids.
• that's for children of up to three years old.这句话的句子结构是怎样的,请大神帮我分析一下这个句子
• I wasn't sure if he was really interested or if he_polite.A.was just being B.had just been Why t...I wasn't sure if he was really interested or if he_polite.A.was just being B.had just beenWhy the answer is Please explain it.
• 英语翻译.