do+动名词短语(doing+whatever从句),是做前面动词do的宾语还是逻辑宾语?Donovan believed in using whatever tools came to hand in the “great game” of espionage -- spying as a “profession.”1、说明1)这个句子从whatever后面都属于动词using的逻辑宾语.2、问题是:using+whatever ….整个作为动名词短语后,believed in 时属于believed in的宾语还是逻辑宾语3、请求:请具体讲解一下逻辑宾语与宾语的区别于联系(考研复习中,)2、问题是:using+whatever ….整个作为动名词短语后;using+whatever …是属于believed in的宾语还是逻辑宾语(改正后的提问,上面的那个提问打错了).Annas says lawyers can play a key role in insisting that these

问题描述:

do+动名词短语(doing+whatever从句),是做前面动词do的宾语还是逻辑宾语?
Donovan believed in using whatever tools came to hand in the “great game” of espionage -- spying as a “profession.”
1、说明
1)这个句子从whatever后面都属于动词using的逻辑宾语.
2、问题是:
using+whatever ….整个作为动名词短语后,believed in 时属于believed in的宾语还是逻辑宾语
3、请求:
请具体讲解一下逻辑宾语与宾语的区别于联系(考研复习中,)
2、问题是:
using+whatever ….整个作为动名词短语后;using+whatever …是属于believed in的宾语还是逻辑宾语
(改正后的提问,上面的那个提问打错了).
Annas says lawyers can play a key role in insisting that these well-meaning medical initiatives translate into better care.
1、为什么说:insisting that these well-meaning medical initiatives translate into better care.
这个部分属于can play a key role in 的逻辑宾语而不是宾语呢?
2、我觉得can play a key role in +insisting that ……就是属于=Vt+o的结构啊,也就是说就是做宾语而不是什么逻辑宾语啊?
(辛苦了,
再次求救,学生于本,我觉得还是没有理解.

你第一个问题打错了吧!believed in后面只能跟宾语,也就是说只能跟名词、代词、动名词之类的,而根据came to判断,其后跟的是一宾语丛句,如要跟丛句,应将in改为that.这时就很容易判断其后的成份了.
第二句相同!saya后面跟的是一个省略了that的宾语丛句,而that these well……作的是insisting的定语丛句.
祝你考研早日成功!