1.Iknow nothing about the accident______I read in the newspaper.

问题描述:

1.Iknow nothing about the accident______I read in the newspaper.
A.except for B.except C.except that D.except what
2.I don't know what ______was for super.
A.it B.that C.there D.foods
3.______his father ,Wang Lin entered the room,_____by his two brothers.
A.Follow ,follow B.Following,follow
C.Hurting ,advising D.Hurting ,advise
4.The new machine_____,if properly,will work for at least ten years.
A.use B.using C.being used D.used
5.The hunter expected _______by the foot for _____the snakesthey caught,this meant the snakes out of the sack and _____them.
A.to be paid ,taking,measuring B.to pay,taking,measuring
C.to be paid ,to take,to measure D.to pay,to take,to measure
1是什么从句?

1.C
翻译:我对于那个事故,除了我在报纸上读到的(内容/信息)之外,我也是一无所知.
此题考查介词except引导宾语从句的用法.
该宾语从句中及物动词read缺少宾语,所以用what代替补充.
2.C
翻译:我不知道晚饭有什么(菜).
此题同样考查及物动词know的宾语从句.
楼主可以这样想:there was "辣椒炒肉" for supper.然后对那道菜名划线提问,当然就是what was there for supper?再把它变成宾语从句即what there was for supper了.
如果选用AB的话,不如直接用what was for supper就可以了,因为what和it/that重复,都做该从句的主语;
如果是foods,就必须把was for supper改成were for supper.
3.此题题目打错,答案为followed,following
翻译:跟着他的老爸,王林进入了教室,后面跟着他的两位兄弟.
对于句子主语Wang Lin来说,他是“主动跟在他老爸后面的”,即Wang Lin和第一个动作follow之间是主动关系:Wang Lin followed his father.
但是Wang Lin和第二个动作follow之间是被动关系,即:Wang Lin was followed by his two brothers.
而根据英语语法规定,作状语的非谓语动词,如果和句子主语之间是主动关系,一般使用现在分词;如果和句子主语之间是被动关系,则使用过去分词.
4.D
楼主又打错题目了,应该是:The new machine,if_____ properly,will work for at least ten years.
翻译:如果被恰当使用的话,这台新机器将会最少可以使用十年.
此题考查状语从句的省略语法.其中if used proerly = if the new machine is used properly.
此语法规定如下:如果状语从句的主语是it或和主句的主语相同,且从句的谓语以be动词开始,则可以把状语从句的主语和be动词一起省略.
如:If possible,I'll call you tomorrow.
= If (it is) possible,I'll call you tomorrow.
再如:I won't attend the party unless invited.
= I won't attend the party unless (I am) invited.
= I won't attend the party if I am not invited.
5.A
猎户肯定是“期望被...付钱”,所以为expect to be paid;
第二空for是介词,后面跟动名词,所以是taking;
mean doing sth意思是“意味着...”,而mean to do sth意思是“想要/打算做某事”,句意不符.