关于英语语法的几个问题,具体问题如下1.The copy in law school was gathering dust on the shelf(in后面怎么不需要加冠词,如果是零冠词的话,那又是出现在哪些情境下）2.not only to unify all its libraries but also to.(请告诉我not only后加to的用法）3.He seemed taken aback,"I thought you Chinese have walls for everything."(这个句中对话的直接引语为什么用了过去式,直接引语不是要用一般现在时的么?)
问题描述：
关于英语语法的几个问题,具体问题如下
1.The copy in law school was gathering dust on the shelf(in后面怎么不需要加冠词,如果是零冠词的话,那又是出现在哪些情境下）
2.not only to unify all its libraries but also to.(请告诉我not only后加to的用法）
3.He seemed taken aback,"I thought you Chinese have walls for everything."(这个句中对话的直接引语为什么用了过去式,直接引语不是要用一般现在时的么?)
答
1.in law ,是固定搭配,这样的词组都不能加减冠词.还有表示独一无二的职位都不加冠词（president,chairman）但是表示第几届总统或者主席的时候要加the2.not only…but also…连接两个相同的成分,要加不定时就一起加,...