请问这是什么语法现象?有这么一段话："So,this idea that you can keep doing this or doing that ...and I love this fact that 'We are going to pay for it.' 'We' are not paying for anything,not 'we' in Washington.The people,the American taxpayer pays for everything.其中：'We' are not paying for anything,not 'we' in Washington.后面那句：not ‘we’ in washington.意思应该是强调前面半句中的‘we’吧,但是为什么用“not” we 为什么要加‘ not’呢.
问题描述：
请问这是什么语法现象?
有这么一段话：
"So,this idea that you can keep doing this or doing that ...and I love this fact that 'We are going to pay for it.' 'We' are not paying for anything,not 'we' in Washington.The people,the American taxpayer pays for everything.
其中：'We' are not paying for anything,not 'we' in Washington.
后面那句：not ‘we’ in washington.意思应该是强调前面半句中的‘we’吧,但是为什么用“not” we 为什么要加‘ not’呢.
答
意思是我们在华盛顿不付任何东西，不是我们付，是别人付
答
not 'we' in Washington. The people, the American taxpayer
这个we不是代表华盛顿的官员们，而是全美纳税者
一般说到华盛顿就表示美国*
答
这是口语.‘ not’是重复前面那个‘ not’,‘we’也是复指前面那个‘we’.
not 'we' in Washington是个省略句,完整的说法是“We,who are in Washington,are not paying for anything.”