issue 119 的写作思路提纲!119"When research priorities are being set for science,education,or any other area,the most important question to consider is:How many people's lives will be improved if the results are successful?" 翻译:当研究的重点被置于科学,教育或者其他领域之中时,最重要的问题就是要考虑如果研究获得成功会有多少人的生活得以改善.这道题我在准备列提纲时感觉很难下手,不知道该从哪几个方面 或者什么角度入手进行讨论.看范文,每篇观点差距挺大,在此,听听大家的看法
issue 119 的写作思路提纲!
119"When research priorities are being set for science,education,or any other area,the most important question to consider is:How many people's lives will be improved if the results are successful?"
翻译:当研究的重点被置于科学,教育或者其他领域之中时,最重要的问题就是要考虑如果研究获得成功会有多少人的生活得以改善.
这道题我在准备列提纲时感觉很难下手,不知道该从哪几个方面 或者什么角度入手进行讨论.看范文,每篇观点差距挺大,
在此,听听大家的看法
给你两个参考,一中一英.
1.能够解决现在最urgent 社会问题的学科理所当然的应该给予优先权.如:通信,经济,商科,法律、医学.A哪些人会受益.B实际证明这些学科也是最兴旺发达的.最优秀的学生通常都去了这些地方.
2.有一些看起来没什么用的长期看会很有用.哲学、文学、历史、数学、物理(其它科的基础).
3.在研究成果没有出来之前,我们很难判断哪些是能给最多人带来利益的.因此,让其平衡发展.按照经济学的观点,那些已经兴旺发达的学科,*不需给予太多关注,否则几年后供大于求;而那些现在默默无闻的学科今后可能是很有用的学科,需要给予扶持.
1.Admittedly,scientific research whose societal benefits are immediate,predictable,and profound should continue to be a high priority.
2.However,this is not to say that research whose benefits are less immediate or clear should be given lower priority.First of all,if we strictly follow the speaker’s suggestion,who would decide which areas of research are more worthwhile than others?Researchers cannot be left to decide.
3.Secondly,to compel all researchers to focus only on certain areas would be to force many to waste their true talents.
4.Thirdly,it is difficult to predict which research avenues will ultimately lead to the greatest contributions to society.