请帮我分析一下这段话的语法结构好吗?
请帮我分析一下这段话的语法结构好吗?
动词writes后为什么直接接of,是固定搭配吗?
She writes of the american indians of the 1930s confined to ever-shrinking reservations and finds that a metaphor for all of modern mankind trapped on a shrinking earth of limited resources.
write of 写到了,提及 短语动词作谓语1,the american indians of the 1930s confined to ever-shrinking reservations 宾语,中心名词是indians,前面有一个词修饰American,后面有两个定语,of the 1930s 和confined to ever-shrinking reservations 限禁在令人发指的居留地的;
并列句2,finds是谓语,发现,后面跟着that指上文提到的事,a metaphor for all of modern mankind trapped on a shrinking earth of limited resources 中心词是metaphor比喻,象征 ;后面跟着一个介词短语作定语for all of modern mankind trapped on a shrinking earth of limited resources; mankind 的后面又有一个过去分词短语作定语trapped on a shrinking earth of limited resources;earth 的后面有一个介词短语作定语of limited resources,后面的并列句的动词模式为find A B 发现A是B.
她写到了20世纪30年代被限制在令人发指的居留地的美国印第安人,并且发现这和被局限在有着有限资源的可怕的地球上的现代人是一回事.谢谢。你的回答很完整。 还有一个小问题: writes of 可以用writes 代替么?不可以,writes of 说的是部分你说的部分,是指句子吗? 那换成writes that可以吧?如果用writes that,那么后面就是一个宾语从句,confined 的前面要用were.在这个句子中也不可取。因为the american indians of the 1930s confined to ever-shrinking reservations 和 all of modern mankind trapped on a shrinking earth of limited resources分别是两个名词短语,名词短语用a metaphor for 来连接;a metaphor for 前面的that代替the american indians of the 1930s confined to ever-shrinking reservations 。