过去分词作状语的时态问题过去分词作状语可以表示完成,是否代表分词动作发生在谓语动作之前?Written in a hurry,this article was not so good!Seen from the hill,the city looks very beautiful.但是又有知识点说分词动作发生在谓语动作之前用having done 、having been done 结构?如 Having been shown around the Water Cube ,we were then taken to see the Bird's Nest .究竟怎么区分呢?
问题描述：
过去分词作状语的时态问题
过去分词作状语可以表示完成,是否代表分词动作发生在谓语动作之前?
Written in a hurry,this article was not so good!
Seen from the hill,the city looks very beautiful.
但是又有知识点说分词动作发生在谓语动作之前用having done 、having been done 结构?
如 Having been shown around the Water Cube ,we were then taken to see the Bird's Nest .
究竟怎么区分呢?
答
你举的两个例子很明显啊，过去分词在这里不表过去，表被动语态，因为主语（article city）是谓语（write/see）的受动者
完成时态才是表分词动作发生在谓语之前
答
过去分词作状语只表示过去和已经.不表示动作发生在谓语动作之前.