请问compared with和 in comparison with的用法区别.具体问题如下

in comparison with 没有修饰seven passengers 它是将 Minivans和most sport utility vehicles进行比较,怎么会修饰passengers呢 把这句话多余部分去除,你可以这么看 In comparison with most sport utility vehicles...可能是我没说清题目，这道是GMAT里的一道句子改错题，这两个选项都是错的。A选项答案解析力明确的说了有修饰前面定语从句的歧义。我还是把原题全部贴上来给你吧，请看我的问题补充答案是不是选D??你前面给出的A选项怎么和后面补充的A选项不是同一句，顺序错乱了？还有 句子末尾那个they是什么意思？以下是我的意见 不知道对不对 错了估计你就只有去问一下更专业的老师了A. Minivans carry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,（与B选项同理 有歧义）B. Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, they cost less,（这里的compared with 确实可以理解为修饰seven passengers，也可以理解为修饰Minivans ，如果理解为修饰seven passengers就是比较座位的多少了 应该翻译为 与大多数的运动型多用车相比，小型货车最多可以载七个人，此外它价格更低（更划算）。如果理解为修饰Minivans 则比较价格，则翻译为与大多数的运动型多用车相比，可以载7人的小型货车的价格更低（更划算）。我觉得这句话最错误的地方是有两个主语，你看 which 和compared with引导的句子是都能被省略的，缩句后，句子就变为Minivans，they cost less 明显不对 C. Minivans carry as many as seven passengers, in comparison with most sport utility vehicles, and have a lower cost, they（同B选项 有歧义）D. Minivans, carrying as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,E. Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles the cost is lower, and they（这句也是 缩句后有两个主语）呵呵，答案是A， D选项的错误跟B选项一样的， compared with 也会造成 修饰seven passenger的误解。看你的回答，你是不是觉得in comparison with和 compared with一样，都有就近往前修饰的可能性