29.With the bridge __________,there was nothing for it but to swim

问题描述:

29.With the bridge __________,there was nothing for it but to swim
A.was destroyed B.destroying
B.being destroyed D.destroyed
我知道这道题考独立主格,可为什么要加being呢?
独立主格 + 过分 为什么要加being呢?

D,首先排除AB,with 不能就此接一个句子,另外桥是被破坏的,不用主动
BD就看情景了,后面说已什么都没,那就不是正在经历的事,只能用Dwith 为什么不能接呀? 我语句结构知识很差的介词要接句子的话,一般不能省略关系代词,常见的独立主格甚至是不用介词的,如the bridge being destroyed,这才是正式的独立主要结构这里有WITH,语法上用D是没问题的,with something done我不认为这题是考独立主格,只不过是状语成分前置了,可能我理解情景有误吧,若主体正在经历此事,就用进行时态更合理的你说不能省略的关系代词是 being吗?这个考题真有点让人模棱两可,它可以说是考with复合结构形式的独立主格,但它又没考虑会让人产生另一种理解With the bridge being destroyed, there was nothing for it but to swim,这种句型其实是可以直接简化化 the bridge being destroyed, there was nothing for but to swim。出题者给多一个介词,本意是想让人更容易想到独立主格这种用法的。但他就忽略了由此产生的另一个问题,就是句子可以理解成there was nothing for it but to swim with the bridge destroyed.这个with成分的位置又是非常灵活的,如果你要用was destroyed, 可以,除非子是with that the bridge was destroyed.