the baby didn't cry any more的同意句可以是the baby no more cried吗?

相关推荐

• The baby didn't cry any more.改为否定句
• 1.after a while ,she didn't cry any more.同意句 after a while ,she ()()cried.
• 下面两个句型转换怎么做1、Do you need any help?He asks.(合并为一个复合句)He asks - - - some help.2、The baby didn't cry any more.(同义句转换）The baby - - -.
• He made faces and the baby didn't cry any more (改为同义句)
• the baby didn't cry any more的同意句可以是the baby no more cried吗?
• the baby didn't cry any more的同意句可以是the baby no more cried吗?
• The baby didn't cry any more.(同义句）
• The baby didn't cry any more.改为否定句The baby ______ _______cried.
• 1.after a while ,she didn't cry any more.同意句 after a while ,she ()()cried.2.they could see nothing unusual,同意句 .they（）see()unusual.3.it only ()him 20 mimutes ()to his officer every day .A took ,to drive B took ,drive C takes ,drive D takes ,to drive.请问第三题中的to his 中的to是到的意思吗?
• The baby didn't cry any more when she saw her mother.同义句The baby______ _______when she saw her mother.同义句
• 英语语法 句子成份 介词短语做宾语与状语的区别某书上的例子,我看的有点糊涂,分别是关于2个句子的解释,如下:They will be trying to keep order to keep order 为什么不是目的状语呢?I drove on to the next town to the next town 是状语 如果按照上面的句子,不也可以是宾语吗?表示承受了drove的动作.感谢2位的回答。2楼的解释我看不太明白，可能我语法知识太差。对于1楼，我问下，是否可以把be try to 理解成尝试做某事，所以后面跟的必然是尝试要做的事情而不是目的呢？这样就可以判断其为宾语.我这样理解可以吗 而你第二个回答是否可以拿来解决我这个问题?I went to Italy 中go 谓语，to italy状语（书中解释) 因为to是介词，并不能和go组成不定式，所以不能把go to 看成谓语，把italy看成宾语。1、They will be coming by train and most of th
• “The boy didn't cry any more.”的同义句