句子主语相同是不是能把be和主语省略,请举例一定要有主从句才能省略be动词和主语吗?

相关推荐

• Smoking is a major factor contribute to cancer.请分析一下这个句子.这句话有两个动词了.be 和 contribute如果它是一个主语从句的话,是不是应该写成That smoking is a major factor contribute to cancer.因为我记得助于从句that应该是不可以省略的呀.可是这又是字典里的句子,应该不会错.我脑子混了.如果它是一个定从，that就应该是在从句中作主语，做主语怎么能省略呢。
• 句子主语相同是不是能把be和主语省略,请举例
• 句子主语相同是不是能把be和主语省略,请举例
• 句子主语相同是不是能把be和主语省略,请举例一定要有主从句才能省略be动词和主语吗?
• She hasn’t got enough money ______ to buy the rings.A.for which B.with which C.that D.which定语从句练习,我也知道选with,可是不是任何一个定语从句后面都有完全的主语和谓语吗,不及物动词可以没有宾语,这道题从句是什么结构呢?还有这个There isn’t so much noise in the country ______ in big cities.A.as B.where C.Which D.that ,我知道是选as,可是后面从句也没有主谓结构啊还有这个为什么选A啊？不是只有做宾语才可以省略吗？What especially impressed us was the way ______ our teacher studied foreign language.A./ B.which C.by which D.what
• Given more time and money,they would have done it better.如果给他们更多的时间和金钱,他们就会做德更好这里面好象是省略的一个条件状语从句,如果补充完整是 1.if they were given ...还是2.if they had been given...两个都可以还是只有其中一个正确啊?如果是1,if可以一起省略吗?这种情况只能省略主语和be动词啊如果是2,那就是一个虚拟语气,能这样省略吗?但我还是不大明白，这里given more time and money究竟是不是由状语从句省略了而来的,为什么能够省略成只剩下given...那if和句子的主谓呢?能全省了吗?
• and 前后动词时态必须一致and前面讲的是过去的事，后面说的现在的事情 那前后时态是否应该一致The memoirs of President Cliton begin with his childhood in Arkansas and culminate in his rise to the presidency.The memoirs of President Cliton began with his childhood in Arkansas and are culminated in his rise to the presidency.请比较上面两段话，哪句更优？
• 英语句子里面什么时候可以省略主语?比如这句：Be a man!