Which should be the priorty in higer education,quality or accessibility?

我主要写quality咯,以前辩过类似的.
1.if no quality,higher education is no longer "higher".it is the quality makes higher education so fansinating.
2.if there is no quality,why shuold we pay higher tuition for the higher education?it is the quality makes higher education on the higher status.
Remember the 4lesson(记不清了..就前几课中的)in new concept English?Mr Blogges are willing to sacrifice higher pay for the privelege of becoming white collar workers.In the same way people are willing to sarcifice higher pay for the better quality from high education.
3.as it is said that sciencce is the first dynamic power of a country.no more than high quality of education can garantee this.
4.a higher education without quality is like a factory that only produces.with quality the factory turns into a farmland that grows new oasis.
再补充个,这次地震的时候不是有几个小学校舍没倒么?这就是质量.国家的栋梁如果质量不好,而只是一些茅草阿什么的不坚固的材料,那么震一震就垮了.国家的希望就在高等教育之中,没有质量就是没有未来!
准备的时候再考虑攻击一下反方阿` 还可以说accessiblity 如果对所有都可以的话就不能体现出其与众不同了,那么现行制度下的高考不也就变得没有意义了?（车道政治上一般都很棘手`~）还有要注意有一点,适度.无论什么辨题,不把适度的问题把握好,就容易被对方牵制了.比如说对方说你只顾质量不顾别的啊,能去学习的人就很少了啊什么的,这是极端过头了.注意适度性.当然要坚持质量是基础.
辩论的关键是让观众相信你而不是对手,对手是早就作好准备无论如何也不信你的```所以要自信是第一,坚持自己观点（对命题有所修正或延伸`）
时间匆忙,写得不好就海涵咯```