GRE写作Argument的第31题!31.The following appeared in the editorial section of a newsmagazine."Some states are creating new laws that restrict the use of of handheld cell phones by drivers of automobiles.Such legislation,however,is sheer folly.Although some people with cell phones undoubtedly cause problems on the road,including serious accidents,the majority do not.Besides,problems are also caused by drivers who are distracted by any number of other activi

GRE写作Argument的第31题!
31.The following appeared in the editorial section of a newsmagazine.
"Some states are creating new laws that restrict the use of of handheld cell phones by drivers of automobiles.Such legislation,however,is sheer folly.Although some people with cell phones undoubtedly cause problems on the road,including serious accidents,the majority do not.Besides,problems are also caused by drivers who are distracted by any number of other activities,from listening to the radio to disciplining children.Since there is no need to pass legislation restricting these and other such activities,it follows that there is no need to restrict people's freedom to use a device that they find convenient-or helpful in emergencies."
一些州正在制定新法律来禁止汽车驾驶员使用移动电话.然而这种立法是很愚蠢的.尽管有些拥有移动电话的人无疑将会在路上引发一些问题,包括严重事故,但大多数人并不会.而且,事故也同样由于因其他行为而分心的驾驶员引发,比如听收音机和管教儿童.由于没有必要通过立法来限制这些行为,因而也没有必要限制人们使用他们认为方便或在紧急时有帮助的设备.
请问该题可以攻击哪几个方面呢?自己完全没有思路……谢谢!
只需大概说下逻辑错误有几个是什么就可以了