过去分词做宾语补足语Who would you rather ()the letter instead?Anyhow,I would like mine ().A.have typed:typeB.have type:typeC.have type:typedD.have typed:typed

问题描述:

过去分词做宾语补足语
Who would you rather ()the letter instead?Anyhow,I would like mine ().A.have typed:typeB.have type:typeC.have type:typedD.have typed:typed

A

选C,have为使役动词,使、让的意思,后接原形
typed为被动的意思,被打

Who would you rather ()the letter instead?  Anyhow,I would like mine ().
   A. have typed:type   B. have type:type
   C. have type:typed   D. have typed:typed
答:这是一道创新题,变了形态的题前一问题句改自下面这一题:
Whom would you rather have _C__ with you?
A. to go B. gone C. go D. went
解释是:将句子还原成为I would rather have Tom go with me. 就Tom划线提问。
在口语中可以用who来代替who放在句首,对宾语进行提问。所以原题的第一空填have type, 看上去不如AD顺眼,但AD是陷井,因为这题不是考现在完成时,而是考变了形的have sb. do sth. 让某人去做某事,本题句意为: 你更愿意让谁和你一起去?
原题句第一句意为:你更愿意让谁来代替(她)来打封信呢?(原题句中应有交代)
后面这句话有漏打的单词,句意与前一句联系不上,纯为出题而生造的句子。
后一题句改自类似于下面的这句话:
Anyhow, I would like to have my problems solved, for I am not waiting for a return to MS Excel if not absolutely needed.
考查 have sth. done 句型,意为让某事被做。原题句可能漏打了to have两字,然加上去也与第一句对不上。如原题句为:Anyhow, I would like to have mine typed. 无论如何,我都想要让我的(信)被打出来。
但是这句话与上一句一点都不关联。最不可理解的是mine=my letter, 前面又没有提到过your letter, his letter, her letter, 后面用mine不知道为什么。

d

应该选C.
have sb.do sth.
have sth done
你的题不完整吧.

不选C选什么、、